And still no math. Words. Lots of pontificating and puffery words. But zero math, which is what you claimed your Niburu theory is based upon.

Good, you digress, this is your vested right to do so.I'm pleased.This would really not be my theory of what planet x is, but a general consensus derived from said sightings and news reports only.Your comments are noted for histories sake.Thank you RMT.

To others for thread linearity, as to what and how the said incoming Nibiru system might look like.The best I can describe it, would be if you were sitting in a small sized fishing boat and someone bentah that boat started to cut up through the bottom of the boat with a chainsaw.

All anyone would see at first, is the tip of then rotating blade, but as time went on, more of the system would start to appear.

Now what I'm going to give here would be an honest appraisal of this oncomeing system and this would be, that since the center of the PX planetary system is said to be an iron silicate brown dwarf, which is nothing more than an iron ball, then this cutting up through our system failed to ignite star, would be wafting off more and more iron particles to a greater extent all of the time.*Note the large brown dwarf has yet to make itself be seen to us?Planet Nibiru, is one of the said planets which orbit around that brown dwarf failed to ignite star.

Two issues would occur.One, people's arthritic conditions along with other health concerns would dramatically be on the increase.Even healthy people would note the discomfort, as our atmosphere would be more and more inundated with particles of fine iron, which would precede this brown dwarf star.

The second issue would be increasingly dramatic lightning storms and all conditions which would be exacerbated by an increase in iron particles within Earth's atmosphere.

In closing here and waiting for other posters from wherever they may be to comment, on the equation ask for by the good Rainman Time poster, this can't be so much done.The reason is is that parts of the equation may be based on deception?

This is said in the passage from the David Wilcox interview as and I quote,"Yea, they've got planet Nibiru all hollowed out now".

If this is true, then Planet Nibiru would not be a true planet, but some sort of spaceship And since a spaceship is a free agent and does not ascribe to follw a set route, then this would be a modulation of a known plantary system, rather than the acrtion of a real planet.So we've got a problem here.

But just for the fun of it, the equation starts with a collection of variables, so I would start the equation with the small letter y as all of the precepts are non real figures and numbers, so a letter can be afforded.The second part of the equation would be the two symbols divide and arrow, which means into.The third part of the equation and this is where I must stop, as remember in the conversation with RMT as said above, the years and both the particulars for Planet x to arrive are it seems as stated a variable, so for one part of the core of the equation, this would be the pound sign #.

The pound sign is really ascribed as a matrix to place variables in, so in probability there would be one to four pound signs, with each quadrant of the tick tack toe being filled up with prescribed and given data from the past as to where they said PX would be here.This info, to the present now and still more pound signs, if PX does not show this year, into still other years when it might show.

All is not lost here, as what can be provided with this bedding of mathematical equations, as a simply fourier, pronounced (for-yeah) figuring process matrix.Since this is a time travel board, you of the future could already be playing out the entire equation.

Each grouping of pounds signs with the many variables held within the spaces of the architecture of those recesses of the pound sign could be factored against one another.However if you've ever seen a mathematician work out an extensive equation as a matrix and can ahead of time determine where you desire to go within that equation, then your'e working out an exceptionally large math matrix.

Thank you and "cheers" to everyone involved, maybe this is a thing-a-ma-jig and it might not show? Pinter