Did Paul McCartney Die in 1966?

PaulaJedi

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 17, 2014
2,051
355
83
46
Zeta Reticuli
www.microsingularity.net
#1
A woman claims to be the daughter of Paul McCartney. She stated that a paternity test was done, but claims that the blood sample wasn't really Paul's. Her allegations also state that his signature is different and he has a different blood type. Ringo Starr recently claimed that Paul really died in 1966 and he was replaced with a look alike.

Paul McCartney Refutes Ringo Starr's Allegations that He Died in 1966

What do you think?

Here is a photo of Paul and a man they claim to be William Shears Campbell.

View attachment 615
 
Likes: creedo299

creedo299

New member
Jan 26, 2002
4,238
25
0
Wash State,
#2
A woman claims to be the daughter of Paul McCartney. She stated that a paternity test was done, but claims that the blood sample wasn't really Paul's. Her allegations also state that his signature is different and he has a different blood type. Ringo Starr recently claimed that Paul really died in 1966 and he was replaced with a look alike.

Paul McCartney Refutes Ringo Starr's Allegations that He Died in 1966

What do you think?

Here is a photo of Paul and a man they claim to be William Shears Campbell.

View attachment 615
I feel that him being eliminated, possibly may have been the case. The reason why I say so, is that reports from that earlier time was that Paul was mentally unstable. There was also the second national factoid that Paul was a hero figure to the young populace of all social ranges and some in government did not desire for that image to be tarnished.

The information that I have been privy to, is that another more stable then British citizen was contacted and briefed that if he had lived the life of Paul, that he would be compensated by the homeland for the remainder of his existence.

By chance the other Paul, "as it were", had also been a competent musician, so just venturing a guess here, this forces the issue into a planned homicidal collusion, to where the entire group may have been, under threat of bodily harm, in on the deal if a planned early demise of Paul was to be the case.

The detail of how this ( getting rid of Paul ), action is a bit murky, but does show there is a possibility that Paul had been killed.

There may have been some linkage to John Lennon and the line of rhetoric that he was imposing later on? But all one has to do is to view the, (Ten Thousand Day War), about Vietnam and to nose into an interview with a senior citizen in the areas of stolen U.S. Social Security Funs by the U.S. congress to keep that insane worthless war running. Then you can begin to see what John Lennon may have been very publically correct about his questions as into the formality of a corrupt governmental and the necessity of keeping government at all?

What does not fit with Paul and John, are the time periods and it just may have been a threatened by social clause person, that killed John Lennon.

*What the group the Beatles had managed to do, was to make the world in some cases take a deep penetrating look into ourselves. Even if Paul had been replaced out of the nervousness that British youth, then, would somehow go asunder, it seemed that the bone wax that had been secretly placed over society with the covert removal of Paul, via their situation in life, turned them into an exceptional fine musical group. *Bone wax is a substance used in surgery to stop bleeding on a bones surface.

It's what you are, when your in it, in the midst of things, that defines one's own character. What makes a person and how this is view by those judgmental of this process we call life. If the current Paul McCarthy is a counterfeit, fashioned within the need of situational time, he is one of the best ones that I have ever seen.

Other reference points on sources, Anastasia and who was she and why had the mechanics of her time stationed her postion in life, as it was.

Thank you for such a great question,
 
Likes: PaulaJedi

creedo299

New member
Jan 26, 2002
4,238
25
0
Wash State,
#3
EDIT TO CAUSE, extra notation. In order to more fully understand the accusation about Beatle Paul, early on, I'm afraid that the concern that government had then, was about claims that Paul. ( the other Paul ), was starting to become a heavy drug users. You must get an eyeball into British society at this time, in order to fully understand this possible issue if this transgression did occur?!

This platen as it was presented, is such that an almost entire generation of girls, ranging from very young to the legal age had been psycho-sexually as well as an edifice of the unattainable were enthralled with Paul. They wanted him in many ways which cannot be displayed here, in this telling.
At that time who also had an eagle's eye placed upon Paul, was not only the British government. This was mainly because within the business phase, "The Beatles were generally making them loads of cash", but the British intelligence services had an eye on him, as well.

If this theory is to float, then we can extrapolate that those higher up, in the social strata, who benefitted from all this made money, equally did not desire a " drug head ", in the congress of business issues to be made. So if you're trying to get a handle on motives for such a killing, this situation is similar to the statement issued by the lawyer in the movie Jurassic Park, to where this fellow says, after seeing a real dinosaur, "We're going to make a fortune on this place ";.. referring to the amount of profit brought in.

So you see, this eventually reflects to the issues of financing, stocks sold and unimaginable profits. At this time, the culture as it were, was beginning to slip into the MOD age in popistry of civilization. There was money to be made and "heaven help anyone who would wander out in front of the Union Jacked money bus", in that goal to make money off the name and or flavor of the Beatles.

If you as a visitor here, are studying this era of society, know that young performers and stars generally got in their share of trouble. In America, there was rock & roller Jerry Lee Lewis, who was interested in a girl that was much too young for him, Merle Haggard as well as others. It seems at times where the stars go in the music and artistic theater performance areas, also do drug pushers, criminals, thieves and all other sorts of riff raff, sometimes attach to that journey.

If you can dial into times and locations, look up singer performer Wayne Newton's on stage tirade in Las Vegas and his say about hangers-on as well a rats in show business? Where there's money to be made, there's sometimes defiantly no shortage of these kinds.
 
Last edited:
Likes: PaulaJedi

PaulaJedi

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 17, 2014
2,051
355
83
46
Zeta Reticuli
www.microsingularity.net
#9
Yes, it's some kind of genetic displacement or sort, because of unknown features of why the body still has to grow.
Evolution in action. The program isn't finished, yet. Sometimes I believe we look unattractive when we age as a way of nature discouraging us from trying to reproduce.